Research

Why Chapter Two Breaks PhD Theses — And How to Get It Right

24th January 2026

Ferdinand | EducationGhana | January 24| Why Chapter Two Breaks PhD Theses — And How to Get It Right

Chapter Two of a PhD thesis remains one of the most rewritten sections in doctoral research. Experts explain why the Review of Related Literature fails and outline five principles that determine whether it succeeds.

Chapter Two: The Most Misunderstood Section of the PhD

For many doctoral candidates, Chapter Two, commonly known as the Review of Related Literature (RRL), becomes the most difficult and repeatedly revised part of the thesis. Supervisors often reject early drafts not because students lack effort, but because the chapter fails to perform its core academic function.

At doctoral level, Chapter Two is not a summary of previous studies. It is a sustained scholarly argument that demonstrates why a research problem remains unresolved and why the present study is necessary.

Academic supervisors and proposal panels consistently evaluate this chapter using a small set of implicit criteria. When these are not met, revision becomes inevitable.

1. The Research Gap Is the Real Purpose of Chapter Two

The primary objective of Chapter Two is to establish a defensible research gap. A research gap refers to an aspect of knowledge that has been overlooked, insufficiently examined, or inconsistently explained in existing scholarship.

Commonly recognised gaps include:

Methodological gaps, where previous studies rely heavily on one approach, creating room for alternative designs such as mixed methods.

Contextual or population gaps, where research is concentrated in developed settings, leaving other regions underexplored.

Contradictory findings, where scholars reach conflicting conclusions on the same phenomenon.

Without a clearly articulated gap grounded in the literature, Chapter Two lacks direction and scholarly weight.

2. Why Theoretical and Conceptual Frameworks Matter

One of the most frequent sources of confusion in doctoral writing is the failure to distinguish between theoretical and conceptual frameworks.

A theoretical framework draws on established theories that explain the phenomenon under study. These theories guide interpretation and shape the study’s assumptions.

A conceptual framework, by contrast, is developed by the researcher. It visually or logically maps how the study’s key variables are expected to relate to one another.

Together, these frameworks provide the intellectual backbone of the study and justify the research design.

3. Summary Is Not Scholarship at Doctoral Level

Many doctoral theses struggle because Chapter Two becomes a series of disconnected summaries.

At PhD level, literature must be synthesised, not listed. Synthesis involves comparing and integrating studies to show where scholars agree, where they differ, and what remains unresolved. Organising literature around themes rather than authors strengthens analytical depth and leads naturally to the research gap.

Supervisors often interpret excessive summarising as a sign of weak conceptual engagement.

4. The Inverted Pyramid Structure Guides Strong Reviews

Effective Reviews of Related Literature typically follow an inverted pyramid structure. This begins with broad theories and international perspectives, narrows into key thematic areas linked to the study variables, and concludes with recent and closely related studies that lead directly to the research questions or hypotheses.

This progression helps examiners follow the intellectual logic of the study and understand how the research problem emerges from existing scholarship.

RELATED LINKS

5. Strategic Searching Separates PhD-Level Work from Coursework

Doctoral literature reviews require systematic searching rather than casual reading. Experienced supervisors expect evidence of: Use of Boolean operators such as AND, OR, and NOT.

Clear inclusion and exclusion criteria, including publication dates, contexts, and journal quality.

Early adoption of reference management tools such as Zotero or Mendeley. Strategic searching improves efficiency and strengthens the credibility of the review.

Why Chapter Two Keeps Being Rewritten

According to research supervisors, Chapter Two is repeatedly revised because students often begin writing before their research logic is settled.

Until the gap, frameworks, structure, and search strategy are clear, rewriting is unavoidable. Strong Chapter Two writing begins with clarity of thought, not word count.

Final Insight for Doctoral Candidates

Chapter Two is where examiners decide whether a study is necessary, original, and theoretically grounded. When written as an argument rather than a catalogue, it becomes one of the strongest sections of a PhD thesis. Students who master this chapter early often find the rest of the thesis far easier to complete.

Join Our Official Revision WhatsApp Channels

For daily Teachers Promotions, Research, mock questions, explanations, and supervision insights:

🔗 https://whatsapp.com/channel/0029Va8kqLX47XeFdyJ0nT3b

Related Internal Links

How to write and address any form of Letter to the Ghana Education Service HERE

How to write and address an Application for Car Maintenance Allowance as a Teacher HERE

How to write and address an Application for Responsibility Allowance as a Teacher HERE

Check This Out: Top 10 Steps to Register and Write Exams in KATon Computing Training Workshop

Check the SHS Grading System HERE

Download the 2022 basic and SHS Academic Calendar HERE

Check This Out:JUST IN: Coalition of Concerned Teachers sacks acting President King Ali Awudu

Prospective students can also check out the Admission Deadlines for Tertiary Institutions in Ghana as well as their Entry Requirements before Applying.

They can also check the institutions’ cut off pointsandHow to Applyto the various Tertiary Institutions in Ghana as well as the institutions’ Fees Schedulesfor any particular Semester or Year.

ELLIS FERDINAND IS THE 2024 EDUCOM BLOGGER OF THE YEAR

SEND US YOUR STORIES FOR PUBLICATION VIA WHATSAPP NUMBER0206361048

Get the WAEC Marking Schemes HERE

Get theNaCCA/GES Standard-Based Lesson Plans HERE

Get the Ghana Education ServiceNew Standard–Based Scheme of Learning (SOL)HERE

Get the Ghana Education Service New Standard–Based Curriculum HERE

Get the WAEC BECE, WASSCE, NTC Licensure Exam, and Teachers’ Promotion Exam Past Questions HERE

Download the Teachers Guide on SBCand CCP Curriculums HERE

♥Copyright Notice: Content on This Website is Copyright Protected. No Part of this Content should be reproduced without the Consent of the Author(s) or Recognition of the source of the content. © 2025 Ellis Multimedia: EducationGhana.org: All Rights Reserved