Get In touch with Ellis Ferdinand on +233 506 440 219
Advertisement
Home CLASSROOM Research Difference between Background of the Study and Literature Review in Research

Difference between Background of the Study and Literature Review in Research

Background of the Study and Literature Review in Research

Ferdinand EducationGhana | January 19 | Difference between Background of the Study and Literature Review in Research


DIFFERENCE BETWEEN BACKGROUND OF THE STUDY AND LITERATURE REVIEW

(PhD Thesis Writing Explained Clearly)

1. Purpose: What Each Section Is Meant to Do

Background of the Study The background explains why the study exists. It introduces the problem in its real-world, historical, policy, or disciplinary context and guides the reader toward the research problem.

Literature Review The literature review explains what is already known about the problem, what debates exist, and what is missing in scholarly knowledge. In simple terms:

  • Background answers: Why is this study necessary?
  • Literature Review answers: What do scholars already know and not know?

RELATED RESEARCH LESSONS

  1. Unlock Your Learning Potential: Advanced Techniques to Enhance Cognitive Abilities
  2. How to Read and Interpret a Quantitative Research Paper In 2024
  3. Simple Steps in writing a Research Abstract with Examples in 2025
  4. How to Transform Your Research into a Publishable Academic Manuscript: A Step-by-Step Guide
  5. How to Write the background to the study in Chapter 1 of a Research Paper

 

 

 

2. Nature of Content

Background of the Study

  • Broad and contextual
  • Descriptive but focused
  • Uses selected references sparingly
  • Builds a logical narrative from general to specific

It discusses:

  • The setting of the problem
  • Policy, institutional, or social relevance
  • Practical concerns that motivated the study
  • Trends, challenges, or changes over time

Literature Review

  • Narrow and scholarly
  • Analytical and critical
  • Heavily referenced
  • Organized by themes, theories, or variables

It discusses:

  • Key theories and models
  • Major empirical findings
  • Methodological approaches used by other researchers
  • Contradictions, gaps, and limitations in prior studies

3. Position in the Thesis Argument

Background of the Study

  • Comes early in the thesis
  • Leads directly to the problem statement
  • Sets the intellectual and practical stage
  • Persuades the reader that a problem exists

Literature Review

  • Comes after the problem is established
  • Justifies the study academically
  • Shows mastery of the field
  • Positions the study within existing scholarship

Think of it this way:

  • The background opens the door
  • The literature review maps the room

4. Use of Sources

Background of the Study

  • Uses fewer sources
  • Sources are used illustratively, not exhaustively
  • References may include reports, policies, and key studies

Literature Review

  • Uses many sources
  • Sources are compared, contrasted, and evaluated
  • Emphasis on peer-reviewed journals and seminal works

A background that reads like a long list of citations is doing the literature review’s job.


5. Level of Critical Engagement

Background of the Study

  • Minimal critique
  • Focuses on explanation and context
  • Rarely debates authors against each other

Literature Review

  • Strong critical engagement
  • Compares scholars’ positions
  • Identifies weaknesses and gaps
  • Challenges assumptions and methods

At PhD level, lack of critique in the literature review is a serious weakness.


6. Relationship to the Research Gap

Background of the Study

  • Points toward the existence of a problem
  • Hints at inadequacies in practice or knowledge
  • Prepares the reader emotionally and intellectually

Literature Review

  • Explicitly identifies the research gap
  • Shows how existing studies fall short
  • Demonstrates exactly where the current study fits

Examiners expect the gap to be proven, not assumed, in the literature review.


7. Common Examiner Complaints

Background of the Study

  • Too long and unfocused
  • Repeats the literature review
  • Lacks a clear problem direction

Literature Review

  • Becomes a summary of studies
  • Lacks critical synthesis
  • Fails to connect to the research questions

8. One-Sentence Distinction (Very Important)

  • Background of the Study: Explains the context and motivation for the research problem.
  • Literature Review: Explains the scholarly conversation surrounding that problem and exposes the gap.

Final Advice to PhD Students

If your:

  • The background reads like a journal article summary; it is misplaced.
  • The literature review reads like a story of context; it lacks rigour.

A strong PhD thesis keeps the two sections conceptually separate but logically connected. Background of the Study and Literature Review in Research      

Join Our Official  Revision WhatsApp Channels

For daily Teachers Promotions, Research,  mock questions, explanations, and supervision insights:

🔗 https://whatsapp.com/channel/0029Va8kqLX47XeFdyJ0nT3b

 

Related Links


 

Related Internal Links


Related Links
 
 

👉 Subscribe to our newsletter for expert insights on Ghana’s education system: educationghana.org/subscribe 📩 For partnerships and research support, contact: Ellisferdinand@ymail.com or Education.ghana@yahoo.com 

OTHER IMPORTANT STORIES
 

 


Discover more from EducationGhana

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Previous articleProfessor Lydia Aziato Becomes Ghana’s First Nurse Full Professor
Next articleNSA Releases PIN Codes for 6,867 Nurses and Midwives for 2026/27 National Service
Ferdinand Ellis
Ellis Ferdinand is a Journalist, Blogger and Founder of Ellis Multimedia, a parent company of EducationGhana.org, an Online Education News Blog, PoliticsGhana.com and GhanaNaija.net.Ellis Ferdinand is a Graduate of Accra College of Education and the University of Cape Coast, where he obtained a Diploma In Basic Education and a Bachelor of Education in Accounting. He is currently Reading his Master of Philosophy in Curriculum and Pedagogic Studies at the University of Education, Winneba in Ghana.Ellis Ferdinand won Blogger of the Year at the 2018 National Students’ Awards and was also adjudged 14th Best Ghanain Blogger in 2018 among the Top 50 Ghanaian Bloggers of 2018.He introduced the Concept of Education Blogging in Ghana in 2014 with his famous blog EducationGhana.net. now EducationGhana.orgHis Blog won Best Media Promoting Education in 2017, 2018 and 2019 respectively, an Award organized by Neogenics Education Consult.In 2019, He adjudged the Most Promising West African Blogger of the Year in Nigeria. He won Writer of the Year at the 2021 EDUCOM AWARDS

What's your take on this Latest Development?

Discover more from EducationGhana

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading