Why Ghana Must Protect the Dignity of Academic Titles

By Ferdinand Ellis

In recent times, there has been a subtle but dangerous tendency in Ghana to trivialize academic titles—particularly the doctoral title, “Dr.” This growing attitude, sometimes championed even by prominent voices in the media and politics, downplays the significance of earned academic achievements in the name of modesty or populism. One such argument cited the former UK Prime Minister Gordon Brown, who rarely used his “Dr.” title despite holding a PhD. But should Ghana use that as a benchmark?

The answer is no—and here’s why.

The Symbolism of the Title

Academic titles, especially PhDs, are not just about status. They are hard-earned indicators of rigorous intellectual inquiry, critical thought, and original contributions to knowledge. A PhD reflects years of research, sleepless nights, personal sacrifices, and peer-reviewed credibility. In a country like Ghana—where the advancement of knowledge, science, innovation, and policy is essential to development—we should not only respect such titles but actively promote and celebrate them.

In academia and research-driven professions, the title “Dr.” signals to stakeholders, students, policymakers, and the public that the individual has attained the highest academic standard in their field. It inspires trust, especially when that individual speaks on education, health, governance, or research.

Global Context: Different Cultures, Different Norms

Yes, Gordon Brown chose not to be addressed as “Dr.” But in the UK, academic titles are often downplayed in public life due to cultural humility, not irrelevance. On the contrary, in Germany, “Dr.” is used extensively and officially. In fact, omitting it in some professional contexts may be deemed disrespectful or legally inaccurate. Japan, India, China, South Africa, and many African countries also hold academic titles in high esteem.

Ghana must define its path not by blindly copying foreign trends but by reinforcing the cultural and institutional relevance of academic excellence within its own context.

Why It Matters in Ghana

In Ghana’s education and public policy sectors, knowledge is a currency of trust. PhD holders are involved in curriculum reforms, public health research, economic modeling, environmental studies, and peace-building. Their expertise shapes national frameworks, influences legislation, and builds capacity across sectors.

To trivialize or mock the use of their titles is to undermine the very architecture of evidence-based decision-making and professional meritocracy.

Moreover, as the country grapples with misinformation and social media sensationalism, reinforcing respect for knowledge systems and experts is more important than ever. Academic titles signal accountability and qualification—two things Ghana desperately needs in both its public discourse and leadership.

Encouraging Aspiration Among the Youth

Another reason to protect the dignity of academic titles is the power of role modeling. Ghanaian students—particularly in marginalized communities—need to see their compatriots rise through the ranks of academia. Seeing and hearing “Dr. Ama Boateng” or “Dr. Kwesi Mensah” on national platforms validates the idea that academic success is achievable and prestigious. It encourages a generation to believe in books, research, and higher education, not just instant fame or political popularity.

Conclusion: Honour What is Earned

Titles like “Dr.” are not honorary labels handed out for applause. They represent a social contract: a promise that the bearer has submitted themselves to the rigors of learning and now offers that knowledge to serve society. If Ghana is to develop into a knowledge-based economy, then it must not reduce academic identity to a punchline or optional prefix.

Let us uphold a culture that celebrates—and not diminishes—the power of learning. We owe it to our future.

By Ferdinand Ellis
Education Policy Analyst & Researcher
📧 ellisferdinand@ymail.com
📍 Accra, Ghana