Why Richlove Oduro’s NSMQ Critique Misses the Mark – A Critical Response by Ellis Ferdinand

By
Ellis Ferdinand
-
Why Richlove Oduro’s NSMQ Critique Misses the Mark – A Critical Response by Ellis Ferdinand
Why Richlove Oduro’s NSMQ Critique Misses the Mark – A Critical Response by Ellis Ferdinand

Ferdinand | EducationGhana | September 09 | Why Richlove Oduro’s NSMQ Critique Misses the Mark – A Critical Response by Ellis Ferdinand

Ellis Ferdinand critically responds to Richlove Oduro’s claims about the National Science and Maths Quiz (NSMQ), explaining why her arguments fall short on facts and academic grounding.

To begin, Richlove Oduro, a student of Kwame Nkrumah Senior High School (Nsein), made several controversial remarks about the National Science and Maths Quiz (NSMQ), describing it as just a “show” and suggesting her school was established to correct the mistakes of schools participating in the NSMQ. Unfortunately, her comments show a lack of understanding of the significance of the programme, which likely contributes to her school’s inability to qualify for the competition.
While I recognize that Richlove’s assertions may have been part of the usual bragging and banter that come with school pride, her arguments were lacking in factual accuracy and academic grounding. Here’s why I strongly disagree with her claims:

1. The NSMQ Is Far From Just a “Show”

Richlove’s characterization of the NSMQ as merely a spectacle reveals a limited understanding of the programme. The NSMQ has earned a reputation as a national platform that highlights academic excellence in science and mathematics. It is a rigorous competition that has not only inspired countless students to pursue careers in STEM but has also provided opportunities for participants to showcase their intellectual abilities on an international stage.
To dismiss it as just a show undermines the hard work and dedication of students and teachers who spend years preparing for the competition. Additionally, the NSMQ has produced several high-profile individuals who have excelled globally, and the competition has undoubtedly contributed to national development.

2. Her Argument on Biological Brilliance Lacks Academic Merit

Richlove argues that students from schools that qualify for the NSMQ are “biologically good” and that their success is due to inherent brilliance rather than teacher training. This argument lacks academic credibility. While natural talent may play a role, it is undeniable that rigorous training and preparation by teachers and coaches are critical in shaping these students. Many of these schools have established strong mentorship and coaching systems that refine the abilities of their students over the years.

3. Selection of Students for NSMQ Representation

Richlove’s claim that these schools handpick only their best students for the NSMQ and that these selected students are the only ones who can answer questions is not only flawed but untrue. While it is common for schools to choose top performers to represent them, this does not diminish the overall quality of education within those institutions. Moreover, most of these schools cultivate a culture of academic excellence, which extends to all students, not just those in the competition.

4. The Broader Success of “Big Schools”

Richlove references schools like PRESEC Legon and Prempeh College, claiming their success is limited to the NSMQ. However, these schools have excelled in various other competitions, including the Sharks Quiz, debates, and robotics competitions. Her suggestion that the success of these schools is limited to the NSMQ is misleading. They have consistently produced leaders in diverse fields, both in Ghana and internationally.

5. The Importance of NSMQ Beyond Theory

In describing the NSMQ as “theory-based,” Richlove seems to misunderstand the various forms of assessment involved in the competition. The quiz challenges students to think critically, solve complex problems, and apply theoretical knowledge in real-world contexts. This is not just a test of memorization but a showcase of applied intelligence.

6. The Role of Big Schools in National Development

Richlove’s argument that the so-called “big schools” have produced only average individuals fails to consider the many influential and noble men and women who have graduated from these institutions. For example, Osagyefo Dr. Kwame Nkrumah, one of Ghana’s greatest leaders, attended Achimota School, one of the “colonial master” schools Richlove criticizes. These schools have shaped individuals of high repute and contributed immensely to the nation’s progress.

7. Success of Top Schools Extends Beyond the NSMQ

Richlove’s suggestion that elite schools like PRESEC Legon and Prempeh College only excel in the NSMQ is misleading. These schools have a track record of success in various competitions, from debates to robotics, and have produced notable leaders and professionals, both in Ghana and internationally.

8. The NSMQ Challenges Critical Thinking

 

The NSMQ tests more than theoretical knowledge. It challenges students to think critically, apply theoretical knowledge in real-world scenarios, and engage in complex problem-solving. Describing it as purely “theory-based” oversimplifies the competition’s value in developing well-rounded students.

 

9. A Bragging Contest with Little Substance

While Richlove’s confidence and eloquence are commendable, they do not necessarily make her argument valid. Her points seem more suited for a school bragging contest than an academic debate. Her criticisms of the NSMQ and the schools that participate in it are mostly unsubstantiated and reflect a personal bias rather than a well-reasoned argument.

Conclusion:

While Richlove deserves applause for her confidence and ability to defend her position, her arguments are largely 90% false and cannot be taken seriously in an academic context. Her attempt to discredit the NSMQ and its participants is misguided, and her view that the quiz is a “joke” does a disservice to the countless students, teachers, and alumni who have made significant contributions to society through their involvement in the competition. She would benefit from acknowledging the value of the NSMQ and accepting the reality that her school has yet to reach the same level of excellence.
It’s clear that Richlove has potential, but her arguments need to be grounded in fact rather than school pride.
By: Ellis Ferdinand | Education Blogger | Curriculum Specialist | Researcher | Accra, Ghana September 7, 2024|

Discover more from EducationGhana

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

RELATED ARTICLESMORE FROM AUTHOR

What's your take on this Latest Development?