One Teacher One Laptop: Teacher Unions petition CHRAJ on the Purchase of Laptop

one GES LIFE
Editorials and Update, September 5, Teachers’ Laptop: Two Teacher Unions have petitioned the Commission on Human Rights and Administrative Justice (CHRAJ) to investigate the Government’s One Teacher, One Laptop policy initiative that has been launched over the week.
This article is an update of concerns being raised by the Unions in March 2021 in their petition to CHRAJ and the implications in September 2021 after the launch of the laptop in Ghana.
The article further discusses pertinent issues from the petition and the implications for further studies on teacher-government relationships.

 


The teacher unions include Innovative Teachers and the All Teachers Alliance Ghana (ATAG).

According to the Unions, the petition was pursuant to Article 218(a) (e) of the 1992 constitution and section 7(1) (a) of CHRAJ Act for CHRAJ to investigate the procurement of 280,000 laptops by the Ministry of Education.

Innovative Teachers was registered on 6th December 2010 and on 30th July 2012 it became a full-fledged Trade Union recognized by the laws of Ghana.

All Teachers Alliance Ghana has been registered and it is a fully-fledged Trade Union since 7th September 2016.

Check This Out: Basic and SHS Teachers demand 5 allowances from the Government of Ghana

 

 


”The request for investigation has become necessary due to the fact that the procurement of two hundred and eighty thousand (280,000) laptops ought to result in a significant reduction in the price for teachers and the taxpayer to pay.”

”The cost of each laptop is purported to be 1,550 cedis and we suspect that this amount is inflated. A thorough investigation into procurement will vindicate our position.”

 


The highest price for this TM1 laptop in our estimation must not be more than 600 Ghana cedis given the specifications of this laptop and the colossal number of 280,000 laptops.”
”It is trite knowledge that manufacturing of electronic gadgets in large quantities makes the price per item very low.” They argued.
_______________________________________________
Issues
The Unions raised pertinent issues concerning the purchase of the Laptop.
1. No survey was done to determine the number of teachers who have laptops and teachers who might not be interested in acquiring laptops from the government through cost-sharing.

2. Teachers who are interested in paying 30 per cent of the cost of the laptop ought to have signed a consent form that would have formed the premise to produce a number of laptops in order to prevent waste of public funds.

3. Procuring 280,000 laptops for all teachers when GES cannot force all teachers to pay 30 per cent of the cost of the laptops is a grotesque waste of public funds and a betrayal of protecting the public purse mantra by the President.

4. GNAT, NAGRAT and CCT acceptance of this deal is irrelevant because the individual teacher has the choice to make whether to pay the 30 per cent cost of the laptop or not.
Deductions of employees’ salaries by the employer are regulated by section 70 (1 a, b, c, d, f and 2a. b, c, d) of the Labour Act (Act 651). Any attempt to force all teachers to pay the 30 per cent will be fiercely resisted through the court.

5. The TM1 laptops are of doubtful quality just like the RLG laptops. There are no parts on the market to replace them when any part needs to be replaced and as a result, it will not last long to deliver the purpose for which they were procured.

6. One cannot fathom but wonder why the state cannot procure laptops from known brands such as hp. Lenovo, Dell, Toshiba, Samsung, Sony, Acer are generally of good quality and their parts can easily be replaced when they get spoilt.

7. The RLG laptops distributed to some teachers and some schools in Ghana that broke down in less than two years and could not be repaired is fueling a sense of uneasiness among teachers in buying these laptops from the government since TM1 is an unknown brand.

8. It is highly patronising and grossly disrespectful for government to give laptops of low quality to teachers as if teachers are so poor that we cannot afford quality laptops as our personal assets.

9. Many teachers have sophisticated laptops and smartphones with better specifications than the laptops GES wants to distribute to teachers.

10. INNOVATIVE TEACHERS is calling on the government to order the company contracted to produce of 280,000 TM1 laptops to stop production immediately.

11. In order to show respect to teachers and the labour law government must acquire laptops such as hp, Lenovo, Toshiba, Acer, and Dell for teachers. The laptops must be given to teachers free of charge. What is good for Article 71 officeholders is equally good for teachers under section 9(a) of the Labour Act.

12. What teachers need now is the payment of the legacy arrears from 2012 to 2016 and not unsolicited distribution of laptops of doubtful quality.
Have you registered for the laptop yet? Register  HERE

One Teacher One Laptop: Teacher Unions petition CHRAJ on the Purchase of Laptop | 1

One Teacher One Laptop: How to easily register using a short code
One Teacher One Laptop: How to easily register using a short code

Check This Out: It is comparatively advantageous acquiring a Teaching Certificate from College than University – Ellis Ferdinand


SEND US YOUR STORIES FOR PUBLICATION VIA WHATSAPP NUMBER0506440219

Get the Ghana Education Service New Standard–Based Scheme of Learning (SOL)HERE

Get the Ghana Education Service New Standard–Based Curriculum HERE

Get the  WAEC Marking Schemes HERE

Get the NaCCA/GES Standard-Based Lesson Plans HERE

Get the WAEC BECE, WASSCE, NTC Licensure Exam, and Teachers’ Promotion Exam Past Questions HERE

Download Teachers Guide on SBC and CCP Curriculums HERE


♥Copyright Notice: Content on This Website is Copyright Protected. No Part of this Content should be Reproduced without the Consent of the Author(s) or Recognition to the source of the Content.© 2020 Ellis Multimedia: EducationGhana.org: All Rights Reserved.♥

What's your take on this Latest Development?